CIOs cutting vendors: 45% of AI budgets replacing existing software spend

Redpoint surveyed 141 CIOs managing $765B in capex. The numbers are not friendly to incumbents. 54% are actively consolidating vendors, 45% say AI budgets are cannibalising existing software line items, and 83% are open to replacing their CRM with an AI-native vendor. Public SaaS multiples sit at 4.1x NTM revenue, the lowest since 2008.

CIOs cutting vendors: 45% of AI budgets replacing existing software spend

The Budget Reality

Redpoint Ventures surveyed 141 CIOs in March 2026. Here is what they said about vendor consolidation and AI spending:

  • 54% are actively pursuing vendor consolidation
  • 45% say AI budgets are coming directly from existing software line items, not new budget
  • Only 3% expect AI to lead to more vendors overall
  • 58% say AI feature additions are the number one driver of software spend increases

That 45% figure matters. When a company buys an AI tool, they are often cancelling or reducing something else. Net new ARR acquisition is harder because AI-native startups are causing buyers to pause before committing to new seats in incumbent platforms.

What This Means for Sales Teams

If you are selling into CIO budgets, the battlefield has shifted. The vendor consolidation push is real, and it is changing how deals get done. Your competitive set just expanded to include every other line item in the IT budget.

Public SaaS multiples are at 4.1x NTM revenue, down from 22x in 2021. That is an 80% contraction. The market is pricing in whether AI compresses long-term growth rates and moats permanently.

CRM Is the Most Contested Category

When asked which categories they are most open to replacing with AI-native alternatives, 83% of CIOs said CRM. Customer service management came in at 56%, ITSM at 55%.

If you are carrying an enterprise AE quota selling CRM or adjacent categories, your buyers are being surveyed by VCs about replacing you. The categories at the bottom of the replacement list: finance ops at 14%, DevOps at 19%, project management at 19%. Those are either too embedded or carry too much integration complexity to move quickly.

The Efficiency Gap

AI-native companies are generating 10x more revenue per employee than legacy software. Cursor is at $6.1M ARR per FTE. Salesforce is at $0.54M. That is a 12x difference, and it is reshaping what a B2B software company should look like structurally.

Private market Series B/C multiples sit at 61x ARR while public high-growth software trades at 9.7x. That spread is historically extreme, driven by private AI-native companies growing median ARR at 640% year over year versus 29% for public comps.

Worth noting: if you are selling enterprise software in 2026, your deal cycles are getting longer and your competitive landscape just got more complex. Budget is not expanding. It is getting reallocated.